<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geek First, Girl Second.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekswithoutgod.com/2012/07/27/geek-first-girl-second/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekswithoutgod.com/2012/07/27/geek-first-girl-second/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://geekswithoutgod.com/2012/07/27/geek-first-girl-second/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekswithoutgod.com/?p=171#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to make a comment here, because it was brought to my attention and I feel it&#039;s important to note. Being female does *not always mean one has a vagina. I am quite confident that the focus of Joe Peacock&#039;s ire and attentions are cisgendered women who are in possession of vaginas, and that is one of the reasons I conflated being female with vagina possession. It&#039;s also a strong word with good comedy value, and I am a comedy writer. 

I want to be very clear: trans women are real women, regardless of the current state of their genitalia. I don&#039;t want anyone to walk away from this post thinking that I don&#039;t fully love and support the wonderful and courageous ladies in the trans community. Much love.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to make a comment here, because it was brought to my attention and I feel it&#8217;s important to note. Being female does *not always mean one has a vagina. I am quite confident that the focus of Joe Peacock&#8217;s ire and attentions are cisgendered women who are in possession of vaginas, and that is one of the reasons I conflated being female with vagina possession. It&#8217;s also a strong word with good comedy value, and I am a comedy writer. </p>
<p>I want to be very clear: trans women are real women, regardless of the current state of their genitalia. I don&#8217;t want anyone to walk away from this post thinking that I don&#8217;t fully love and support the wonderful and courageous ladies in the trans community. Much love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
